Thursday, June 14, 2012

Thursday Thinking - Juvenilization of Christianity

Christianity Today has published a very important and perceptive article titled "When Are We Going to Grow Up?"  The article was adapted from Thomas Bergler's new book, The Juvenilization of American Christianity, a book I will need to read.

Having lived through the time period, cultural evolution, and church practices Bergler describes, I have to say that I think he is spot-on in his analysis of the situation. Sadly, I feel like his observations are more of an astute postmortem than a diagnosis with a hope for a cure. I fear that the juvenilization he outlines has turned many churches into terminal patients. One thing is certain, the disease is deadly, and any treatment that produces healthy results is likely to be painful and unwelcomed by those who need it most.
Here are some excerpts from the CT article:
Fifty or sixty years ago, these now-commonplace elements of American church life were regularly found in youth groups but rarely in worship services and adult activities. What happened? Beginning in the 1930s and '40s, Christian teenagers and youth leaders staged a quiet revolution in American church life that led to what can properly be called the juvenilization of American Christianity. Juvenilization is the process by which the religious beliefs, practices, and developmental characteristics of adolescents become accepted as appropriate for adults. It began with the praiseworthy goal of adapting the faith to appeal to the young, which in fact revitalized American Christianity. But it has sometimes ended with both youth and adults embracing immature versions of the faith. In any case, white evangelicals led the way.
Saving the World

Juvenilization happened when no one was looking. In the first stage, Christian youth leaders created youth-friendly versions of the faith in a desperate attempt to save the world. Some hoped to reform their churches by influencing the next generation. Others expected any questionable innovations to stay comfortably quarantined in youth rallies and church basements. Both groups were less concerned about long-term consequences than about immediate appeals to youth.

In the second stage, a new American adulthood emerged that looked a lot like the old adolescence. Fewer and fewer people outgrew the adolescent Christian spiritualities they had learned in youth groups; instead, churches began to cater to them.

- - -

...Churches new to juvenilization would do well to consider its unintended consequences. Juvenilization tends to create a self-centered, emotionally driven, and intellectually empty faith.In their landmark National Study of Youth and Religion, Christian Smith and his team of researchers found that the majority of American teenagers, even those who are highly involved in church activities, are inarticulate about religious matters. They seldom used words like faith, salvation, sin, or even Jesus to describe their beliefs. Instead, they return again and again to the language of personal fulfillment to describe why God and Christianity are important to them. The phrase "feel happy" appeared over 2,000 times in 267 interviews.

 - - -

Today many Americans of all ages not only accept a Christianized version of adolescent narcissism, they often celebrate it as authentic spirituality. God, faith, and the church all exist to help me with my problems. Religious institutions are bad; only my personal relationship with Jesus matters. If we believe that a mature faith involves more than good feelings, vague beliefs, and living however we want, we must conclude that juvenilization has revitalized American Christianity at the cost of leaving many individuals mired in spiritual immaturity.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE

The Juvenilization of American Christianity
by Thomas E. Bergler


2 comments:

  1. From Facebook - Jordan Lane Peacock wrote:

    I don't think this problem is limited to Christianity, but is rather symptomatic of a broader cultural issue. This affects Christianity mostly due to the latter's close ties to the former - a separate but related problem.

    Not that I'm reflexively in favour of existing institutions - quite the opposite - but they should never be deconstructed needlessly or without reflection.

    And not every aspect of the change has been for the worse, but the problem has been how to embrace change without "revolution". Too many people want "radical" change, not realizing that most institutionalizations are safeguards of things learned in the past, the demolishment of which means we get to learn them again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Facebook - Eddie Britz wrote:

    Definitely a book worth reading.

    ReplyDelete